[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Using octave runtime in a commercial product
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
RE: Using octave runtime in a commercial product |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:50:27 -0500 |
On 13-Nov-2009, Søren Hauberg wrote:
| Are you suggesting that companies should be able to get Octave under a
| different license for some amount of cash? While such money would be
| helpful, I don't think the approach would be practical as we would have
| to get this accepted by all the people that have contributed to Octave
| during the last decade. This would be a huge task...
Somewhat longer than that now, almost 18 years. And some of the
contributors are dead, so contacting them might prove to be
difficult.
jwe
- Re: Using octave runtime in a commercial product, (continued)
- Re: Using octave runtime in a commercial product, David Bateman, 2009/11/12
- Re: Using octave runtime in a commercial product, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/12
- Re: Using octave runtime in a commercial product, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2009/11/13
- Re: Using octave runtime in a commercial product, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2009/11/13
- RE: Using octave runtime in a commercial product, Eduardo Fuentetaja, 2009/11/13
- RE: Using octave runtime in a commercial product, Søren Hauberg, 2009/11/13
- RE: Using octave runtime in a commercial product,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Using octave runtime in a commercial product, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/13
- RE: Using octave runtime in a commercial product, Eduardo Fuentetaja, 2009/11/13
- Re: Using octave runtime in a commercial product, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2009/11/13