[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: single/double precision in C++
From: |
Peter Søndergaard |
Subject: |
Re: single/double precision in C++ |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:50:14 +0100 |
> Neither would I - that's why I recommended to improve the ltfat
> headers. But when you're dealing with legacy code...
> Of course, an alternative is to bother the extra copy and just get a
> writable pointer. But that doesn't work if you're a little obsessed by
> performance, like me :)
>
No worries :-), I will put in CONST as suggested.
Cheers,
Peter.
> regards
>
> --
> RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
> computing expert & GNU Octave developer
> Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
> Prague, Czech Republic
> url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
- single/double precision in C++, Peter L., 2009/11/09
- Re: single/double precision in C++, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/09
- Re: single/double precision in C++, Peter L., 2009/11/10
- Re: single/double precision in C++, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/10
- Re: single/double precision in C++, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/10
- Re: single/double precision in C++, John W. Eaton, 2009/11/10
- Re: single/double precision in C++, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/10
- Re: single/double precision in C++, John W. Eaton, 2009/11/10
- Re: single/double precision in C++, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/10
- Re: single/double precision in C++,
Peter Søndergaard <=
Re: single/double precision in C++, Sergei Steshenko, 2009/11/09