Re: octave and delay ode's

[Thomas Treichl]

Carlo de Falco schrieb:
> Thomas,
>
> On 2 Nov 2009, at 20:26, Thomas Treichl wrote:
>
> > Because there is an "ode" in the subject of the email, yes, but I also 
> > must say that I currently don't have the time to dig into this problem 
> > and can only provide a short answer: if the above equations form the 
> > DDE problem then Carlo's implementation does make more sense to me.
>
> Thanks for your answer, I was not 100% sure I was doing things correctly as
> it seems to me that the case of mutiple delays is not fully clear from 
> the documentation (I looked at the implementation to find out the 
> meaning of LAGS).
> So if you believe my interpretation was correct, would you mind if I 
> commit the patch below to improve the documentation of the DDE functions?

These changes would be an improvement.
Can you please make these changes also for ode45d, ode54d and ode78d?

Thanks, Thomas