[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Binaries for SLES10
From: |
Søren Hauberg |
Subject: |
Re: Binaries for SLES10 |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:00:37 +0200 |
tir, 20 10 2009 kl. 14:33 +0200, skrev Andreas Kuntzagk:
> > At my previous just I had to use SUSE as well, and getting Octave up and
> > running was not a particular joyful experience. SUSE is just not very
> > good at packaging basic scientific libraries, so you'll have to compile
> > a lot of stuff yourself from scratch.
>
> Yeah, but for this I need to find out what libraries are missing and
> where to get them.
I think the easiest approach is just to run ./configure and see what is
reported as missing.
> Unfortunately changing distro is not an option right now. This is a big
> compute cluster (in production) and I can't start from scratch again.
> For the next time what distro do you propose for scientific computing?
Yeah, I didn't expect that you could just change distro. I think Debian
is quite good at packaging everything you need, and I get the impression
that Fedora is also quite good, but I've never used it.
Søren
- Binaries for SLES10, Andreas Kuntzagk, 2009/10/20
- Re: Binaries for SLES10, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2009/10/20
- Re: Binaries for SLES10, Andreas Kuntzagk, 2009/10/20
- Re: Binaries for SLES10, Søren Hauberg, 2009/10/20
- Re: Binaries for SLES10, Andreas Kuntzagk, 2009/10/20
- Re: Binaries for SLES10,
Søren Hauberg <=
- Re: Binaries for SLES10, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/10/20
- Re: Binaries for SLES10, Andreas Kuntzagk, 2009/10/28
- Re: Binaries for SLES10, Mário Costa, 2009/10/28
- Re: Binaries for SLES10, Andreas Kuntzagk, 2009/10/29
- Re: Binaries for SLES10, Mário Costa, 2009/10/29
- Re: Binaries for SLES10, Mário Costa, 2009/10/30
Re: Binaries for SLES10, Andreas Kuntzagk, 2009/10/20