[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: getopt
From: |
Juergen Rose |
Subject: |
Re: getopt |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:28:32 +0200 |
Am Samstag, den 10.10.2009, 12:12 -0400 schrieb John W. Eaton:
> On 10-Oct-2009, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
> | > If I try to write a function my_getopt, the testing of the options is
> | > probably not so hard. But how I can reset argv, that it after the call
> | > the call of my_getopt contains only the non option arguments, I have
> | > no
> | > idea.
> | > Juergen
> |
> | I have no good idea how to handle that problem.
>
> You would need to do something like
>
> [opt_struct, remaining_args] = getopt (opt_string, varargin);
>
> then proceed with processing the returned options structure and the
> remaining arguments.
>
> jwe
Hi John,
thank you for the answer. I did not expect that something like getopt is
not yet implemented in octave. All other languages I use (C, bash, perl,
R) have such a possibility. For me as a octave newcomer it is not very
easy to do it.
Juergen
- getopt, Juergen Rose, 2009/10/10
- RE: getopt, dastew, 2009/10/10
- RE: getopt, Juergen Rose, 2009/10/10
- Re: getopt, Ben Abbott, 2009/10/10
- Re: getopt, Juergen Rose, 2009/10/10
- Re: getopt, Ben Abbott, 2009/10/10
- Re: getopt, John W. Eaton, 2009/10/10
- Re: getopt,
Juergen Rose <=
- Re: getopt, John W. Eaton, 2009/10/10
- Re: getopt, Judd Storrs, 2009/10/10
- Re: getopt, Juergen Rose, 2009/10/10
- Re: getopt, Judd Storrs, 2009/10/10
- Re: getopt, Juergen Rose, 2009/10/10
- Re: getopt, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/10/10
- Re: getopt, Juergen Rose, 2009/10/10
- Re: getopt, Carlo de Falco, 2009/10/11
- Re: getopt, Martin Helm, 2009/10/10