[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Benchmarking Octave 322
From: |
Corrado |
Subject: |
Re: Benchmarking Octave 322 |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:00:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.28-13-generic; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ; ) |
How is that for a laptop?
octave:1> benchmark
Octave benchmark version bm 2.3
Speed of octave 3.2.2 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Pentium II 350 MHz has score 1.0, higher numbers are better
Matrix inversion (LAPACK) 14.98 +/- 0.1% (252 runs)
Schur decomposition (LAPACK) 54.52 +/- 0.4% (322 runs)
Differential equation (LSODE) 40.81 +/- 0.2% (980 runs)
Fourier transforms (FFTPACK) 23.09 +/- 0.4% (609 runs)
for loop 75.20 +/- 3.6% (1365 runs)
-- Performance index (bm 2.3): 36
octave:2>
I think I could still optimise Matrix inversion though
On Friday 11 September 2009 15:59:33 Francesco Potorti` wrote:
> >The package is also low priority for me; besides, it seems almost
> >nobody uses it.
>
> It's not user friendly. While the disadvantege of my old package is
> that it is not so modular as yours. That is another reason why I always
> thought about merging. If someone wanted to do that...
--
Corrado Topi
Global Climate Change & Biodiversity Indicators
Area 18,Department of Biology
University of York, York, YO10 5YW, UK
Phone: + 44 (0) 1904 328645, E-mail: address@hidden