|
From: | Christophe Tournery |
Subject: | Re: .oct files - keeping state across calls |
Date: | Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:58:13 +0200 |
The code tries to store handles to a library in a map. The key to the map is passed back to octave such that the "user" can choose on which instance of the library a function is called.
Thanks for testing and I am curious to know if you guys think it is a bug in 3.2 or if it was "un-intentionally" working in 3.0.
Christophe Tournery Testing in Octave 3.0.5: ------------------------ octave:1> h1 = mylib_init() h1 = 0 octave:2> h2 = mylib_init() h2 = 1 octave:3> mylib_destroy(h1) octave:4> mylib_destroy(h2) Testing in octave 3.2.0: ------------------------ octave:1> h1 = mylib_init() h1 = 0 octave:2> h2 = mylib_init() h2 = 1 octave:3> mylib_destroy(h1) error: mylib_destroy: handle '0' does not exist! octave:3> mylib_destroy(h2) error: mylib_destroy: handle '1' does not exist! On Jul 9, 2009, at 8:41 PM, David Bateman wrote:
Christophe Tournery wrote:At this point I'm not sure there is a problem at all. Could you send a complete simple example demonstrating the problem..Thanks for the tip, I did not know mlock().However the problem is still there. The list of handles has a different memory address when calling the mylib_init() function and when calling the mylib_process() function. Has there been major changes from 3.0 to 3.2 regarding loading oct files?Do you guys encounter this design problem often or is there a very simple solution I do not see?D. -- David Bateman address@hidden 35 rue Gambetta +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Home) 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt FRANCE +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
octtest.zip
Description: Zip archive
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |