octave 3.1.55 different from 3.0

[Bertrand Roessli]

Hello,

if I execute this function in both Octave 3.0 and 3.1.55 I get 
a different answer and I think that 3.0 is right?


function test

M_cell=cell(4,1);
M_cell{1}=0;
for l=1:3
        M.mat(1:3)=[l l l];
        M_cell{l+1}=M;
endfor

disp(M_cell);
endfunction

in Octave 3.0

{
  [1,1] = 0
  [2,1] =
  {
    mat =

       1   1   1

  }

  [3,1] =
  {
    mat =

       2   2   2

  }

  [4,1] =
  {
    mat =

       3   3   3

  }

}

and the development version
{
  [1,1] = 0
  [2,1] =
  {
    mat =

       2   2   2

  }

  [3,1] =
  {
    mat =

       2   2   2

  }

  [4,1] =
  {
    mat =

       3   3   3

  }

}

Bertrand Roessli