[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave memory
From: |
jean francois sauvage |
Subject: |
Re: octave memory |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:06:21 +0100 |
Thank you !
Well, I tried the getrusage function. On windows system (sigh...) all
the memory fields are filled with NaN.
thank you, again. I really appreciate the interest you show to solve
my problem ;o)
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:52 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 11-Feb-2009, jean francois sauvage wrote:
>
> | You are right, the inverse of a sparse matrix is generally not sparse.
> | My idea is to use Cholesky factorisation. But I want to know how much
> | space is needed by this factorisation. I can check this on Windows
> | Task Manager, but without separating the contributions of the
> | different process.
> |
> | but okay, it seems there is no built-in way to reach this information
> | from octave. maybe I can write an octave function interfaced with a
> | terminal command (like "top").
>
> I think the maxrss field of the structure returned by the getrusage
> function should give you what you want, but on my GNU/Linux system,
> that field is always 0. So finding out why that happens and fixing
> the problem would probably be a better solution.
>
> jwe
>
- Re: octave memory, Søren Hauberg, 2009/02/11
- Re: octave memory, John W. Eaton, 2009/02/11
- Re: octave memory, jean francois sauvage, 2009/02/11
- Re: octave memory, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/11
- Re: octave memory, jean francois sauvage, 2009/02/11
- Re: octave memory, John W. Eaton, 2009/02/11
- Re: octave memory, Miroslaw Kwasniak, 2009/02/11
- Re: octave memory, John W. Eaton, 2009/02/11
- Re: octave memory, Thomas Weber, 2009/02/12
- Re: octave memory, Miroslaw Kwasniak, 2009/02/12
- Re: octave memory,
jean francois sauvage <=
Re: octave memory, Rob Mahurin, 2009/02/11