help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gnuplot doesn't work with octave 3.0 on UBUNTU


From: thomas vanderbruggen
Subject: Re: Gnuplot doesn't work with octave 3.0 on UBUNTU
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:40:55 +0200 (CEST)
User-agent: SquirrelMail

Here is /usr/apt/sources.list :

# See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to
# newer versions of the distribution.

# deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 7.04 _Feisty Fawn_ - Release i386 (20070415)]/ feisty main restricted
deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy main restricted #Added by software-properties
deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 8.04 _Hardy Heron_ - Release i386 (20080423)]/ hardy main restricted
deb http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy main restricted
deb-src http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy restricted main multiverse universe #Added by software-properties

## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the
## distribution.
deb http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy-updates main restricted
deb-src http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy-updates main restricted #Added by software-properties

## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to
## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in
## universe WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu security
## team.
deb http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy universe

## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to
## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in
## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu
## security team.
deb http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy multiverse

## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from the 'backports'
## repository.
## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as
## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes
## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features.
## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review
## or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
# deb http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ feisty-backports main restricted universe multiverse
# deb-src http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ feisty-backports main restricted universe multiverse

deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hardy-security main restricted
deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hardy-security restricted main multiverse universe #Added by software-properties
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hardy-security universe
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hardy-security multiverse

deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 8.04 _Hardy Heron_ - Release i386 (20080423)]/ hardy main restricted

And here is the result of  $ apt-cache policy octave3.0 :

octave3.0:
  Installé : 1:3.0.0-9ubuntu1
  Candidat : 1:3.0.0-9ubuntu1
 Table de version :
 *** 1:3.0.0-9ubuntu1 0
        500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/universe Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status


Le Mer 22 octobre 2008 09:57, Thomas Weber a écrit :
> Am Mittwoch, den 22.10.2008, 02:51 +0200 schrieb Dorian:
>
>> That file libpcre.so.0 should not be there,
>> it is probably leftover from a feisty or gutsy --> hardy upgrade.
>
> It's pretty unlikely that libpcre.so.0 was _ever_ part of an Ubuntu
> release. pcre3 was introduced in Debian in 2000.
>
>> sudo rm /usr/local/lib/libpcre.*
>
> You know, you should apply the cluebat mentioned earlier to yourself
> every time you issue a "rm" command as root[1]. That will sensitize you to
> do it rarely. "mv" to a backup is a far superior approach: if everything
> worked out, you can still delete these backup files.
>
> If there are libpcre packages in the above directory, chances are they
> are used by other software (PCRE is a much used library, used by KDE for
> example). Removing them will break your system, _badly_. Add to that
> packages that install stuff under /usr/local, and you might even break
> packaged software.
>
>
> [1] That's not specific to you: "rm" as root is dangerous.
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]