[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: negative indexing of matrix or general access
From: |
Jaroslav Hajek |
Subject: |
Re: negative indexing of matrix or general access |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:01:13 +0200 |
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:05 AM, <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I don't think that names "array" and "matrix" are a good idea. I'd
>> prefer something like "setbounds", "unsetbounds" to emphasize what the
>> functions are doing. Otherwise, this should be simple to achieve using
>> the OO stuff. I guess overriding a couple more functions like "find",
>> "min", and "max" may do some good.
>
> You are right, these functions should be named to emphasize what the
> functions are doing.
>
> Functions "min", "max", "find" (and maybe some others else) should
> also be revised to operate on this new object.
>
> So, how we can start writing such package? I want to help to writing
> such package.
> I suppose that I will be learn something, to write such package to
> octave project.
> For any materials or links how to start I will be very graceful.
>
IMHO, creating first a toy package in the form of a set of m-files is
a good start.
> Best wishes,
> Zbigniew
>
--
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz