[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parallel octave ??
From: |
Bill Denney |
Subject: |
Re: Parallel octave ?? |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:09:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) |
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Javier_Fern=E1ndez_ wrote:
> On the other hand, I found mpirun easier to use with Open-MPI, since no
> daemon has to be previously started (no equivalent to lamboot is
> required in OMPI). Recently there was a question on spawning in their
> mailing list, but I'm not sure they're talking on this same issue
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2008/08/index.php
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2008/07/6211.php
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2008/08/6256.php
> The "subject" matches the point, anyways. I suppose I miss the
> "spawn_sched" info tag I was used to in LAM :-)
Hi Javier,
I'm curious how easy it would be to modify this to write a parfor
command? I'm probably completely off on this, but it sounds like this
could translate into parfor without huge issues.
Thanks,
Bill