[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
is IMAGE_PATH irrelevant?
From: |
ChrisPaola |
Subject: |
is IMAGE_PATH irrelevant? |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:21:16 -0700 (PDT) |
Looking over past posts it appears there was talk of eliminating the
IMAGE_PATH as a separately specifiable variable and just using the current
file path for images as well. Was that actually done? I can't seem to read
images using imread from the directory specified by IMAGE_PATH; I get a
'cant find file' error unless I have the file path set to that directory. Am
I missing something or is IMAGE_PATH no longer being used?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/is-IMAGE_PATH-irrelevant--tp19037895p19037895.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- is IMAGE_PATH irrelevant?,
ChrisPaola <=