help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: About octave performance...


From: David Bateman
Subject: Re: About octave performance...
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:52:33 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080725)

Francesco Riganti wrote:
Dear All,
first of all, a very big "tank you" for this wonderful project. I have a
little question: in the next feature of octave, it will be an
improvement versus matlab performance?
Actually, i think this is the most immediate problem to solve. Infact,
despite the use of vectorization, matlab is more fast then octave. In my
university, I would like to build a cluster system for octave using
instead of matlab sofware. However, the not yet good performance of
octave versus matlab, not encourage the cluster project. Can you tell me
something about it?
Best Regards

Francesco Riganti Fulginei
Department of Applied Electronics
Roma Tre University
Rome

_______________________________________________
Help-octave mailing list
address@hidden
https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/help-octave

Take a look at the thread

https://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2008-April/006984.html

in short FreeMat has started implementing LLVM JIT in their development tree and I imagine we'll copy their code once they make some progress. I therefore expect this to be a target for the 3.4.x (or will that release be 4.0) of Octave sometime in about a years time.

Regards
David

--
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) The information contained in this communication has been classified as: [x] General Business Information [ ] Motorola Internal Use Only [ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]