|
From: | David Bateman |
Subject: | Re: About octave performance... |
Date: | Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:52:33 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080725) |
Francesco Riganti wrote:
Dear All, first of all, a very big "tank you" for this wonderful project. I have a little question: in the next feature of octave, it will be an improvement versus matlab performance? Actually, i think this is the most immediate problem to solve. Infact, despite the use of vectorization, matlab is more fast then octave. In my university, I would like to build a cluster system for octave using instead of matlab sofware. However, the not yet good performance of octave versus matlab, not encourage the cluster project. Can you tell me something about it? Best Regards Francesco Riganti Fulginei Department of Applied Electronics Roma Tre University Rome _______________________________________________ Help-octave mailing list address@hidden https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/help-octave
Take a look at the thread https://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2008-April/006984.htmlin short FreeMat has started implementing LLVM JIT in their development tree and I imagine we'll copy their code once they make some progress. I therefore expect this to be a target for the 3.4.x (or will that release be 4.0) of Octave sometime in about a years time.
Regards David -- David Bateman address@hiddenMotorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) The information contained in this communication has been classified as: [x] General Business Information [ ] Motorola Internal Use Only [ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |