[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time
From: |
HempyElmo |
Subject: |
Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time |
Date: |
Thu, 29 May 2008 08:50:36 -0700 (PDT) |
Hi,
I've got a Matlab code which I want to run on Octave. With Matlab this
program takes about 5 minutes under Windows XP on a Intel Pentium 4 2.4 GHz
to make an output .mat. With Octave on the same computer, it took ages...
maybe 30 times more processing time. Same thing happens for Octave with the
same version (2.9.15) on a Linux machine (Intel Xeon 2.8 GHz). Is anybody
have a reason why? Is it because of Octave or the code itself?
The code reproduce a particle in cells simulation. I don't know how many
loops it makes.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Differences-in-Matlab-Octave-processing-time-tp17537903p17537903.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time,
HempyElmo <=
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, Stuart Brorson, 2008/05/30
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, Francesco Potorti`, 2008/05/30
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, Michael Goffioul, 2008/05/30
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, David Bateman, 2008/05/30
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/30
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/05/30
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2008/05/30
- Re: Differences in Matlab/Octave processing time, HempyElmo, 2008/05/30