[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure
From: |
Francesco Potorti` |
Subject: |
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure |
Date: |
Fri, 09 May 2008 01:54:55 +0200 |
>If no one runs on a 64-bit platform none of the bugs of 64-bit systems
>will be found.
I am running a dual core amd64 with Debian testing, and I see no
problems with Octave. Isn't that built with 64 bits?
--
Francesco Potortì (ricercatore) Voice: +39 050 315 3058 (op.2111)
ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR Fax: +39 050 315 2040
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Email: address@hidden
Web: http://fly.isti.cnr.it/ Key: fly.isti.cnr.it/public.key
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, (continued)
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/08
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/08
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/09
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/09
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/12
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/12
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/05/12
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/05/08
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/05/08
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Przemek Klosowski, 2008/05/09
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Francesco Potorti`, 2008/05/12
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/05/08