[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure |
Date: |
Thu, 08 May 2008 22:12:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080306) |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> I'm still not exactly clear on what the benefits of 64bit environments
> are, and for us "early adopters", it seems that there are are more
> drawbacks. I've seen at least one software package segfault due to
> assumptions of 32bit pointers, and I am currently suspecting that one
> more package is suffering the same.
If no one runs on a 64-bit platform none of the bugs of 64-bit systems
will be found. That being said I have the misfortune of currently
running on a 64bit system and yes there are lots of bugs, and I only
just got a version of java that worked, etc etc etc. I haven't tried a
64-bit compile of Octave yet though :-)
D.
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, (continued)
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/08
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/08
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/08
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/09
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/09
- RE: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Labitt, Bruce, 2008/05/12
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/05/12
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/05/12
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure,
David Bateman <=
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Francesco Potorti`, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, John W. Eaton, 2008/05/08
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/05/09
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, John W. Eaton, 2008/05/09
- Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/05/09
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/05/08
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Przemek Klosowski, 2008/05/09
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Francesco Potorti`, 2008/05/12
Re: Octave 3.0.1 Scientific Linux 5.1 (RHAT) build failure, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2008/05/08