|
From: | Thomas Treichl |
Subject: | Re: Mac problem with octave.app and BBEdit |
Date: | Sun, 04 May 2008 13:38:42 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) |
Vic Norton schrieb:
I have a problem with octave.app and BBEdit that just appeared when I installed the 3.0.1 version of octave.app. Here's the problem.I have a script named "newLSPortf.m". It begins with the shebang line #!/Applications/Octave.app/Contents/Resources/bin/octave Let's say the script is open in BBEdit. If I do #! > Run in Terminalin BBEdit, then the script runs perfectly and I get some output in a Terminal window.On the other hand, if I do #! > Runin BBEdit, then I get then same output in a "Unix Script Output" window followed by a list of warnings that all say the same thing: warning: load_path: ./Applications/Octave.app/Contents/Resources/share/octave/site/m: No such file or directoryThis is definitely a problem between octave.app-3.0.1 and BBEdit. I have just reinstalled octave.app-3.0.0 and the warning messages no longer appear. BTW I am running BBEdit 8.7.2 on Mac OS X 10.4.11 PPC G5.Does anyone have any idea what might be causing this problem? Regards, Vic
Hi Vic,this is strange. The only thing I can see in your message above is the 'dot' before '/Applications/...', ie. have a look in the 'current' directory for that path. If you 'currently' are not working in the 'root' path of your system then this message would make sense.
Otherwise, when you say it is not there with 3.0 but it comes with 3.0.1 then what might have been changed? I don't have any knowledge about BBEdit - don't have it installed. And some days ago we had a discussion about shebang lines, I don't get any *m file to run your way, the workaround on my 10.4.9 i386 is:
#!/bin/sh /Applications/Octave.app/Contents/Resources/bin/octave The discussion was http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=5c0c2c290804101146u6b3a3f19s34c00bb754c2c9be%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=octave-devOh, this could be an idea, try that shebang line instead, maybe this will help you because it does not depend on a relative path './Applications' ...
Regards, Thomas
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |