help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Plot problem. Hold on active between re-runs.


From: bharat pathak
Subject: Re: Plot problem. Hold on active between re-runs.
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 19:41:34 +0530

Hello Ken,

From now on you always do like this,

figure; clf; hold on;
plot(...
plot(...
plot(...
hold off;

figure; clf; hold on;
plot(...
plot(...
plot(...
hold off;

This will solve your problem and resolve stikiness phenomena.

rgds
bharat


----- Original Message ----- From: "kensmith" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: Plot problem. Hold on active between re-runs.


On Thursday 01 May 2008 13:57, Nose Nada wrote:
Hello there!
I'm using Octave 3.0 (running on Fedora 8). I have several plots in
the same figure thanks to hold on. However, when I close the figure
and re-run my function the old plots appears in the new graph
together with the new plots. They accumulate along runs of my
function. If I remove hold on I solve this problem but I lose the
capability of multiple plots in the same graph in a single run. If
instead I use hold off after the plotting instructions in a single
run, I keep having the accumulation problem. If I close and restart
Octave the first run comes with no old plots but the second already
accumulates.
How can I get rid of the accumulation problem?
Thanks in advance,
Omar

hold on
and
hold off

work like flipping a flip-flop back and forth.  If you say

hold off
plot ....
hold on
plot ...
hold on
plot ....
hold on

you will build up only those plots.  The extra "hold on" commands do
nothing bad.



--
address@hidden
_______________________________________________
Help-octave mailing list
address@hidden
https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/help-octave



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.23.7/1410 - Release Date: 01-05-2008 17:30



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]