Re: change to residue.m

[Ben Abbott]

On Dec 29, 2007, at 9:59 PM, Doug Stewart wrote:

> Ben Abbott wrote:
> > Doug Stewart and I invested some time and effort improving the  
> > accuracy of the residue.m script when pole multiplicity exists.
> >
> > Doug's suggestion, which we've each invested several hours testing,  
> > was to set the value of each unique pole to that average of the  
> > multiple poles associated with it. The result has been found to be  
> > a few orders of magnitude more accurate.
> >
> > To capture the improvement, the test scripts were also modified to  
> > be more stringent.
> >
> > In the event, for those interested in verifying our work,  I've  
> > attached the patch and ChangeLog.
> >
> > Ben
> I don't see any response to this  Email   from Dec 24th on the  
> maintainers list.  Did it get implemented?
> Doug Stewart

I haven't checked the cvs, but I don't think so. I plan to submit it  
to John for consideration tomorrow.

Ben