Re: eigs and Octave.app

[Thomas Weber]

Am Montag, den 12.11.2007, 19:24 +0100 schrieb David Bateman:
> Note ARPACK is a fedora package for example as it has been cleared by
> their lawyers for distribution in Fedora..

Are you sure? RiceBSD.doc is listed under "not okay" at 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing


> >   Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> >   modification, are permitted provided that the foll
> I'd like nothing better given the effort I put into writing the eigs
> function. I'm just not willing to chase Sorensen at this point, but
> would endorse anyone else who did.

I wonder if using ARPACK all over the place and hence flooding Rice with
letters would be an effective way of encouragement for a license
change ;)

        Thomas