What would this entail and what kind of knowledge level would be required?
Manny
>I should point out that your test is much too small to get an accurate >characterization. The tic and toc functions are m files in octave and
>builtin functions in matlab (BTW, I think this might be a worthwhile
>enhancement for anyone who wants a small project). Running nothing more >than tic; toc takes 0.02 sec in octave and 0.000011 sec in matlab on my >computer. So, If I make your test large enough to make that difference
>negligible: >tic; test = 1:1e7; nc = cumsum(test); toc >I get 0.73 seconds in octave and 0.51 seconds in matlab. For any heavily >vectorized operation like this, the times should be not too different.
>Matlab will be considerably faster on code that is not heavily >vectorized because its interpreter is faster. Any contributions to the >project to make octave's interpreter faster are welcomed.
> >Quentin
[Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread]
Re: Help-octave Digest, Vol 19, Issue 44,
Manuel Mendez<=