[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using LAPACK in octave
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: Using LAPACK in octave |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:10:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 25-Sep-2007, David Bateman wrote:
>
> | In fact xGELS, xGELSY, xGELSD and xGELSS all return the same minimum
> | norm solutions. There is therefore no reason not to change to xGELSS..
> | Consider the attached patch, before this addition I had the following
> |
> | octave:1> A = rand(500,499); t = cputime(); b = A \ ones(500,1);
> | cputime() - t
> | ans = 3.1035
> |
> | and after the patch I get
> |
> | A = rand(500,499); t = cputime(); b = A \ ones(500,1); cputime() - t
> | ans = 0.23296
> |
> | with ATLAS 3.6.0 installed. As for the accuracy, both versions returned.
> |
> | octave:2> norm(A*b)
> | ans = 22.361
>
> Please check in this change.
>
Done.
D.
- Re: Using LAPACK in octave, (continued)
- Re: Using LAPACK in octave, Quentin Spencer, 2007/09/11
- Re: Using LAPACK in octave, David Bateman, 2007/09/11
- Re: Using LAPACK in octave, David Bateman, 2007/09/11
- Re: Using LAPACK in octave, John W. Eaton, 2007/09/11
- Re: Using LAPACK in octave, David Bateman, 2007/09/11
- Equivalent of LSQR in matlab, Jean-Baptiste Poullet, 2007/09/13
- Re: Equivalent of LSQR in matlab, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2007/09/13
- Re: Equivalent of LSQR in matlab, John W. Eaton, 2007/09/13
- Re: Using LAPACK in octave, David Bateman, 2007/09/25
- Re: Using LAPACK in octave, John W. Eaton, 2007/09/26
- Re: Using LAPACK in octave,
David Bateman <=
Message not available