[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [unclassified] Re: patch: Invalid call to __patch__
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: [unclassified] Re: patch: Invalid call to __patch__ |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
kahacjde wrote:
> So for example:
>
> patch(rand(4,1),rand(4,1),'blue','FaceColor','red')
>
> is valid and plots a blue patch
I just reread that.. Then there is no use setting the FaceColor property
at all as the original color argument takes precedence. This is not how
I implemented it, and the last argument in the list takes precedence..
Should we respect this treatment of the properties? I'd prefer not to....
D.
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
- patch: Invalid call to __patch__, Matthias Brennwald, 2007/09/24
- patch: Invalid call to __patch__, Matthias Brennwald, 2007/09/24
- Re: patch: Invalid call to __patch__, David Bateman, 2007/09/24
- Re: patch: Invalid call to __patch__, kahacjde, 2007/09/24
- Re: [unclassified] Re: patch: Invalid call to __patch__, Kai Habel, 2007/09/24
- Re: [unclassified] Re: patch: Invalid call to __patch__, David Bateman, 2007/09/24
- Re: [unclassified] Re: patch: Invalid call to __patch__, kahacjde, 2007/09/25
- Re: [unclassified] Re: patch: Invalid call to __patch__, David Bateman, 2007/09/25
- Re: [unclassified] Re: patch: Invalid call to __patch__,
David Bateman <=
- Re: [unclassified] Re: patch: Invalid call to __patch__, Kai Habel, 2007/09/25
patch: Invalid call to __patch__, Matthias Brennwald, 2007/09/24