[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnuplot versus matlab plot: a suggestion
From: |
kensmith |
Subject: |
Re: gnuplot versus matlab plot: a suggestion |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jul 2007 08:05:06 -0700 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
On Saturday 14 July 2007 05:51, Matthias Brennwald wrote:
[.....]
> How about this: in addition to the 'standard' Matlab variables in a
> figure handle, add a 'hook' containing the name of a files that
> contains some user-specified gnuplot commands. Normally, this hook
> would be empty, and nothing would be changed from the normal
> behaviour. If the hooks are not empty, Octave would send the commands
> in these files to gnuplot after executing the 'normal' Octave
> plotting stuff, and then replot the firuge. This would allow to play
> all sorts of gnuplot tricks.
>
> (Maybe the hook should not be gnuplot specific, but should be
> applicable to other plotting programs like graceplot, too?)
If the commands were in an array of strings, they could more easily be
computed on the fly.
>
> Matthias
> _______________________________________________
> Help-octave mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/help-octave
--
address@hidden
Re: gnuplot versus matlab plot: a suggestion, etienne, 2007/07/17