|
| From: | Matthias Brennwald |
| Subject: | Re: print question |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:47:37 +0200 |
On 26.06.2007, at 16:55, address@hidden wrote:
| Not that 'print' supports pdf, but shouldn't that have been '-dpdf'? Yes. Now I see that it is defaulting to a terminal type of epsc plus a conversion program (convert, from ImageMagick), which apparently uses ghostscript to generate the pdf file. I think it would be better to use gnuplot's pdf file generator.
This assumes that gnuplot was compiled with pdf support. The eps -> pdf conversion should be retained for gnuplots without pdf support.
Apart from that (regarding the original proplem): what if you save the figure to an eps file instead of pdf?
Matthias ------- Matthias Brennwald Lägernstrasse 6 CH 8037 Zürich +41 (0)44 364 17 03 address@hidden
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |