[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: RE: using binary octave 2.9.12
From: |
asha g |
Subject: |
Fwd: RE: using binary octave 2.9.12 |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jun 2007 03:04:27 -0700 (PDT) |
-
>
> Dear Michael,
> >
> > When comparing with Matlab,
> > the only area where octave performed bad was with
> > "for" loops; all other results
> > were comparable with Matlab.
> >
> > Michael.
> >Can you explain what you mean by octave performed
> badly was " for " loops. I ask this as one of my
> programs with plenty of "for" loops written in
> OCtave
> 2.9.12 running on Fedora 5.2 is taking about 3 hours
> to execute. While I did not do the same number of
> iterations in MATLAB, I do think it was quicker.
> Could
> this be an OCtave issue or the computer or both?
> Asha
>
>
>
>
>
> Goals too clearly defined can become blinkers.
> Mary Catherine Bateson
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
> Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
>
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz
>
Goals too clearly defined can become blinkers.
Mary Catherine Bateson
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo!
FareChase.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/