Re: user defined octave classes

[tino . scherrer]

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: "Muthiah Annamalai" <address@hidden>
> Gesendet: 24.04.07 01:39:11
> An: "Tino Scherrer" <address@hidden>
> Betreff: Re: user defined octave classes


> 
> On 4/23/07, Tino Scherrer <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I am trying to port a matlab program to octave that includes some user 
> > defined classes (as described at 
> > http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/techdoc/matlab_prog/f6-48272.html).
> >
> > Is this OOP syntax/grammar available from octave (couldn't find it)? Are 
> > there plans for future releases? Or is it not worthwhile to think about 
> > OOP, because for some reason the octave design doesn't allow it?
> >
> > Tino
> > _______________________________________________________________
> 
> I think, personally, Matlab OOP is a mis-feature, and must go-away.
Why? Do you mean the whole idea if OOP inside Matlab or just how it is solved 
by MathWorks?

> In case you are unlucky to have such code, please rewrite it, its worth
> a lot of effort.
> 
> In case you didnt write it in the first place, please glean useful parts,
> and write new code that is compatible to Octave & Matlab.
> 
> Otherwise, 'classes' are a work in progress, is the official reply.
Why should 'classes' (implying OOP?) be a mis-feature in Matlab, but not in 
octave?
Is there some place to find out about the status and maybe contribute to the 
progress?

Thanks
TIno


_______________________________________________________________
SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und
kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! http://f.web.de/?mc=021192