Hmmm,
In "/usr/local/include/octave-2.1.72/octave":
% ls -a | wc
545 545 7312
In "/usr/local/include/octave-2.9.4/octave":
% ls -a | wc
454 454 6368
Looks like more files in the old install, so I'm going to guess 2.9.4
is pooching during the build/install. I'll rebuild, save a build log
and get back to the list with what I find out shortly. Thanks much,
-Jason
John W. Eaton wrote:
On 20-Mar-2006, Jason Russler wrote:
| It just looks to me like:
| a) octave-2.9.4 does not install a "version.h" and "default.h" in |
"/usr/local/include/octave-2.9.4/octave", and 2.1.72 does (in |
"/usr/local/include/octave-2.1.72/octave"). Which would imply to me
| that octave-forge is not intended to work at all with the
development | version of Octave. or:
| b) Octave-2.9.4 is suppose to install these files during the
install | process but does not dues to a bug in the install process
or some other | issue with our systems.
It is supposed to install the files, so I think there is a bug. What
files are installed in the include directory? It should be
approximately the same as the files in 2.1.72, but probably more files
now.
jwe
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------