help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GUI vs. CLI


From: John W. Eaton
Subject: Re: GUI vs. CLI
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 01:12:58 -0500

On 15-Mar-2006, Quentin Spencer wrote:

| I agree this would be useful. Aren't the general-purpose IDEs for Linux 
| like KDevelop and Eclipse customizable so that you could make them do 
| this for Octave? It seems like that would be the easiest path to a 
| Matlab-like IDE--in fact I thought I remembered someone saying they were 
| working on something like this for Eclipse a while back.

But it still all gets back to how does the IDE/GUI thing communicate
with Octave, doesn't it?  I still think the most effective thing will
be if the IDE/GUI is integrated with Octave, so they are not both
trying to handle events independently, and so that the IDE/GUI does
not end up reimplementing things that already exist in Octave (the
command line editor, history, the diary, etc.).

Also, a couple of the things that were mentioned were editor tasks
(code indenting and region commenting).  Does it really make sense for
Octave to have a separate lame editor that is just different enough
from every other lame embedded editor to be really annoying?  I mean,
why does every application need its own editor?

jwe



-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]