[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: save function
From: |
Francesco Potorti` |
Subject: |
Re: save function |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Mar 2005 22:11:33 +0100 |
>imaginary parts of complex numbers) and current behavior. Maybe something
>like "-ascii-annotated" would be a good name for the current "-ascii"
>feature.
The -ascii switch is very useful and handy. I always use it, because I
never know how I will manage may data. I only use -binary when I am
going to reuse the data immediately, in the same run.
This means that, in my personal situation, I wouldn't be afected by an
incompatible change to the -binary format, I wouldn't even realize it.
But I would be affected by a change in the -ascii format, because I
could be saving more than one variable and later find that the file is
useless without the meta information.
Apart from my personal habits, if it must really happen that -ascii
behaviour is changed (I hope not), then please choose an equivalently
short name, like -text or whatever, don't use -ascii-annotated.
--
Francesco Potortì (ricercatore) Voice: +39 050 315 3058 (op.2111)
ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR Fax: +39 050 313 8091
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Email: address@hidden
Web: http://fly.isti.cnr.it/ Key: fly.isti.cnr.it/public.key
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: save function, (continued)
- Re: save function, Francesco Potorti`, 2005/03/08
- Re: save function, Robert A. Macy, 2005/03/08
- Re: save function, John W. Eaton, 2005/03/08
- Re: save function, Mike Miller, 2005/03/09
- Re: save function, Hamish Allan, 2005/03/09
- Re: save function, David Bateman, 2005/03/09
- Re: save function, John W. Eaton, 2005/03/09
- Re: save function, Hamish Allan, 2005/03/09
- Re: save function, John W. Eaton, 2005/03/09
- Re: save function, Mike Miller, 2005/03/09
- Re: save function,
Francesco Potorti` <=
- Re: save function, John W. Eaton, 2005/03/09
- Re: save function, Francesco Potorti`, 2005/03/10
- Re: save function, mavram, 2005/03/09
- Re: save function, Hamish Allan, 2005/03/09
- Re: save function, John W. Eaton, 2005/03/09
- Re: save function, Mike Miller, 2005/03/09
- Re: save function, Mike Miller, 2005/03/09
- Re: save function, David Bateman, 2005/03/10
- Re: save function, Robert A. Macy, 2005/03/09
- Re: save function, John W. Eaton, 2005/03/09