[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binary versions of functions
From: |
Michael Creel |
Subject: |
Re: binary versions of functions |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:59:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7 |
> Paul Kienzle wrote:
> > Turning your code into a C++ extension doesn't help. Even assuming the
> > m-file to C++ translators were far enough along for your purpose, the
> > GPL requires that you distribute the source for any oct-file that you
> > supply.
>
Is this really true? The simple act of distributing an oct file compiled using
using mkoctfile means that the source code must be GPL'ed? Or any binary
compiled with gcc and distributed means the source must be GPL'ed? Or is the
issue what is #include -ed?
M.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------