[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: Re: Octave advocacy
From: |
Victor Munoz |
Subject: |
Fwd: Re: Octave advocacy |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:57:47 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 08:11:31AM +0200, Nathan Weisz wrote:
> I completely agree with Mike and find Rif's comments rather childish.
> Judging from my experience almost any Matlab script/function that does
> not need/produce GUIs or plot too sophisticated graphics will run in
> 99% of the cases without problems (especially if Octave-Forge is
> installed alongside).
I'd like to add to that, indeed. My own experince was that I had to switch
from Matlab to Octave when I changed University and Operating System. I had
a lot of matlab scripts which ran just fine in Octave. The only problem was
that I also used things like ginput and cells in Matlab, and they did not
work. But that forced me to re-write a couple of front-end scripts. The
rest, wonderful. In a few days I was working again.
Victor
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Octave distribution (was: Re: Octave advocacy), (continued)
- Re: Octave distribution (was: Re: Octave advocacy), Mike Miller, 2004/09/17
- Re: Octave distribution (was: Re: Octave advocacy), Dirk Eddelbuettel, 2004/09/17
- Re: Octave distribution (was: Re: Octave advocacy), Paul Kienzle, 2004/09/17
- Re: Octave distribution, Jonathan Stickel, 2004/09/18
- Re: Octave distribution, Paul Kienzle, 2004/09/18
- Re: Octave distribution (was: Re: Octave advocacy), Stefan van der Walt, 2004/09/22
Re: Octave advocacy, Keith Goodman, 2004/09/17
Re: Octave advocacy, Javier Arántegui, 2004/09/20
Fwd: Re: Octave advocacy,
Victor Munoz <=