Re: recursion and fsolve

[David Bateman]

>I have a problem that involves a recursive call to "fsolve".  To get 
>around the lack of recursion for "fsolve", I do all the solving in one 
>(big) set of equations.  It would be much nicer and, I believe, more 
>efficient,  to do this in a recursive fashion.
>
>My suggestion to the developers of octave is to include, or allow the 
>inclusion of, a second copy of "fsolve" with a different name.  With a 
>different name, there would be no recursive call.  This would at least 
>allow an effective recursion of depth one.

Should a patch like that in this message be sufficient? Want to try it
with a test case..

D.




-- 
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola CRM                                 +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary

patch.fsolve
Description: Text document