help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Octave-Forge make failure under Red Hat 9


From: Paul Thomas
Subject: Re: Octave-Forge make failure under Red Hat 9
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 21:10:47 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225

Julius Smith wrote:

Ok, I'm sorry I suspected that the problems were not platform-dependent and that the project couldn't build. I agree that my email contained incorrect speculation and that I should have given the developers of the Communications Toolbox more benefit of the doubt.

To explain why I overstepped, I had just lost a precious afternoon debugging their package under Red Hat Linux, which I didn't realize was a second-class platform at the time. My life is such that half an afternoon can be an entire WEEK of discretionary personal time. Yes, I was having a bad day.

However, what I want to make sure all interested readers realize is that I immediately followed up that email, before anyone else had a chance to respond, reporting that I had determined that the problems WERE platform-dependent. Instead of accepting my restated second email, the developer choose to react to the previous, obsolete email. Now there is a whole thread on that. I really don't think this is fair. A person should be able to "take something back", especially when they get to it before anyone has a chance to respond. Obviously I am not the only one who feels the need to complain about something that doesn't exist.

I confess not to being a "developer"; just somebody who, like you, is rushing to catch up with miniscule amounts of discretionary time. I am just back from an overseas trip and did not see your later message. As my neighbours say - desolé

Paul T


jos

At 09:06 AM 7/3/2004, Paul Thomas wrote:

Przemek Klosowski wrote:

  According to Julius Smith <address@hidden> (on 06/24/04):

> It is interesting that both of the current make failures in octave-forge > under Red Hat 9 were due to the Communications Toolbox. The maintainers of > this toolbox apparently do not bother to try compiling their project before > submitting it to octave-forge. I find it hard to believe these are > platform-specific bugs.

If the maintainters were indeed that delinquent, we'd have no choice
but to send them to bed without supper.  I doubt, however, that it is
the case here: you seem to assume that your locally installed toolchain is working fine, but at the same time you have reported mysterious and
sometimes irreproducible compilation errors (in GCC and TeX).

For the sake of the young readers here, please indulge this little
pontification. I found it works well for me to err on the side of
giving the benefit of the doubt to others when passing out the
blame. Most of the time, even if it seems to me that I am right and
others are wrong, I try to tone down what I am saying: many a time I
managed not to come out as an idiot by forcing myself to hedge my
statements. The difference between saying "maintainers [..] apparently
do not bother to try" and "I wonder why it didn't work for me" might
count if our assumptions turn out to be wrong.

In this case, I'd run some hardware tests, and check and report the
versions of programs in my toolchain.

            p


I have to second this - my Octave-Forge build under RH9 worked so flawlessly that I thought that it had gone wrong. I had to check that, all of a sudden, I had sparse matrices before I was convinced that all was well.

Paul T


-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html








-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]