[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Which version of Octave?
From: |
Michael Martin |
Subject: |
Re: Which version of Octave? |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:49:42 -0600 |
On Mar 23, 2004, at 8:28 PM, Joe Koski wrote:
As I see it there are several contributing reasons to our problems.
First,
UNIX is still relatively new to the Mac, and Mac users are still a
minority
within the UNIX community.
I would venture to mention that there are more Mac OSX installations
than any other particular brand of Unix out there, including Linux. I
dare say Linux will likely that the lead one day, simply because of the
sheer number if Intel platforms out there and people realizing that
there is more to life than Windows. However, at least for now Mac OSX
is in the lead.
This leads to "critical mass" problems. How many
Mac octave users are there? A dozen? A hundred? There simply are not
enough
Mac users (yet?) to to justify a simple .dmg type installation of
octave and
octave-forge.
That, I think is the problem. While there are lots and lots of Mac OSX
users out there, how many are actually into open source? With Linux, by
definition one has chosen an open source solution and will need to deal
with open source installation issues. Mac OSX opens up the Mac to open
source solutions, but that does not mean all its users will
automatically use open source solutions (other than those installed by
Apple). Right now I can think of a dozen or so Mac users here at work
and I am really the only one to use open source solutions.
I suspect that there are several reasons for resistance to open source
solutions on the part of many Mac users. Most Mac users are Mac users
by virtue of ease of use. Open source applications are not always top
notch for ease of use by unwashed masses. They can be cantankerous to
install and then their interfaces can be quite frankly bewildering to
them. Because of this, I suspect there is some reluctance to adopt open
source applications by some Mac users.
But as to the installation issue, no easy to use install, less
openness to open source solutions, I suspect. Some groups are trying to
fix that in various ways. As for me, I prefer fink, in part, because of
ease of use and access to quite a few open source solutions. It has its
share of problems, but generally speaking I have found them to be
minor. However, while I like fink, something even easier/pre-compiled
is very desirable for the command line challenged.
As to shells, it really does not matter. It is whatever shell you can
run and whichever you like best. Like people, all have shells have
their idiosynchracies. I have always been a tcsh man myself and for the
present I will certainly remain that way. I have **a lot** of sh & tcsh
scripts I'd rather not convert. When Panther came out, I remained with
tcsh. Now bash is certainly popular in Linux, and that is why Apple
went with it as the default with Panther. However, from what I have
seen, bash not nearly so popular on non-Linux systems. Now it is,
perhaps due to Linux, being used more and more and perhaps one day will
be as popular on non-Linux systems as it is in Linux. So pick one.
On Mar 24, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Jonathan Stickel wrote:
I don't have much basis to post to this thread since I have touched a
Mac only a few times in my life. That said, what about installing
linux directly on your Mac hardware, perhaps dual boot with MacOSX?
Gentoo Linux is available for the ppc architecture, and octave is
available for easy install through Gentoo's portage system
(http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=octave).
Well, it might make installing Octave easier, but now one has to deal
with TWO operating systems. Two sets of updates, two sets of sw, etc.
etc. etc. This application won't run here, only runs there, etc. No
thank you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael W. Martin Phone: (281) 333-2177
Draper Laboratory FAX: (281) 333-5276
2200 Space Park Dr. EMail: address@hidden
Houston, TX 77058 WWW: http://www.jsc.draper.com/
USA Mail Code: EG/Draper
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Which version of Octave?, (continued)
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Per Persson, 2004/03/22
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/22
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Henry F. Mollet, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Henry F. Mollet, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Jonathan Stickel, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, A S Hodel, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, John B. Thoo, 2004/03/25
- Re: Which version of Octave?, A S Hodel, 2004/03/25
- Re: Which version of Octave?,
Michael Martin <=
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Paul Kienzle, 2004/03/23
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Christoph Dalitz, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Paul Kienzle, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Paul Kienzle, 2004/03/24
- Re: Which version of Octave?, John W. Eaton, 2004/03/25
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Dirk Eddelbuettel, 2004/03/26
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Joe Koski, 2004/03/26
- Re: Which version of Octave?, Mike Miller, 2004/03/23