[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Starting using octave
From: |
THOMAS Paul Richard |
Subject: |
RE: Starting using octave |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:20:26 +0100 |
Thanks for that one! It worked straight out of the box and within 5
minutes, I had it linked up to my Intel compilers. I like the look of the
Matlab/Octave style. It even comes with batteries!
Paul
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Shai Ayal [mailto:address@hidden
Envoyé : mardi 2 décembre 2003 07:53
À : address@hidden
Cc : acoohdb; address@hidden
Objet : Re: Starting using octave
and now for my $0.02 :)
SciTe is a very good editor which has:
1) windows look & feel
2) GPL
3) very good hilighting of octave code
4) small footprint
see http://www.scintilla.org/SciTE.html
really, for windows users emacs/xemacs are quite intimidating because of
their unfamiliar GUI design philosophy. SciTe offers high quality
editing with a familiar GUI
Shai
address@hidden wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2003 at 12:52am, acoohdb wrote:
>
> acoohd >>For the ultimate Octave hacking experience, I'd recommend running
it
> acoohd >>from within Emacs ( NT Emacs, in your case ), with Octave-Mode
> acoohd >>on. That will give you about as much editor as one can handle.
;-)
> acoohd >
> acoohd >I'm running 98SE, not being a fan of m$. My pascal versions run in
DOS,
>
> Wait, you're not a fan of m$, and you're running 98SE? Talk to Dirk
> about Quantian. :-)
>
> acoohd >largely because when using a PC as a process controller, I like to
be in
> acoohd >total command. Pascal (even very early ones) shipped with a small
and
>
> Total command? Great! You're describing GNU Emacs (works on 98SE):
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/windows/ntemacs.html
>
> acoohd >simple editor that was your front end to the compiler and only
later,
> acoohd >when one had more experience, did one contemplate more powerful
third
> acoohd >party ones. That meant you were up and running from the off and I
would
> acoohd >guess very few new users were even aware of the nuts and bolts
going on.
> acoohd >I suspect many never were.
>
>>From within Emacs, you can have multiple windows open. So, for
> example, I'm often working with a window open for my source code, one
> for a shell ( in your case, the DOS shell ), and one showing my
> interactive Octave session. You can do this with other computer
> languages as well. Plus, Emacs does source code hi-lighting in
> multiple colors, which makes catching syntax bugs easier.
>
> Just my $0.02,
>
> ~Tomer
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
>
> Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
> How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
> Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
--
Shai Ayal, Ph.D.
Scientific Project Manager
BioControl Medical (B.C.M.) Ltd.
3 Geron St.
Yehud 56100
ISRAEL
Tel: + 972 3 6322 126
Fax: + 972 3 6322 125
email: address@hidden
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.536 / Virus Database: 331 - Release Date: 03/11/03
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.536 / Virus Database: 331 - Release Date: 03/11/03
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
RE: Starting using octave,
THOMAS Paul Richard <=