index inconsistency?

[Albert F. Niessner]

Why does octave index matrices (vectors) from 1..m, 1..n and then the
indexing in Matrix -- the C/C++ code for dynamic loaded functions --
done from 0..m-1, 0..n-1?

It really is not that big of deal. I was just wondering if anyone knows
or remembers the rationale for doing it this way.

Al Niessner



-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------