[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Machine epsilon, Octave and Matlab
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Machine epsilon, Octave and Matlab |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:37:15 -0500 |
On 30-Aug-2001, Geraint Bevan <address@hidden> wrote:
| The original poster was actually Craig Stoudt enquiring about the
| difference between Matlab and Octave under Win2000. However, you are quite
| right about the result being the same on the SGI as on the Alpha:
Sorry, I lost track.
Now, are there any experts out that who know whether this difference
is something that is a bug (in the floating point implementation, not
Octave) or allowed by the standard? It seems odd that 1/(1+one bit)
results in exactly 1, but maybe I should not be surprised. Is this
due to the rounding mode and possibly having different defaults for
that on different systems?
jwe
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Machine epsilon, Octave and Matlab, Craig Stoudt, 2001/08/29
- Re: Machine epsilon, Octave and Matlab, geraint . p . bevan . itar, 2001/08/29
- Re: Machine epsilon, Octave and Matlab, Craig Stoudt, 2001/08/29
- Re: Machine epsilon, Octave and Matlab, geraint . p . bevan . itar, 2001/08/29
- Re: Machine epsilon, Octave and Matlab, Thomas Shores, 2001/08/29
- Re: Machine epsilon, Octave and Matlab, Christoph Spiel, 2001/08/30
- Re: Machine epsilon, Octave and Matlab, Thomas Shores, 2001/08/30
- Re: Machine epsilon, Octave and Matlab, John W. Eaton, 2001/08/30
- Re: Machine epsilon, Octave and Matlab, Geraint Bevan, 2001/08/30
- Re: Machine epsilon, Octave and Matlab,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Machine epsilon, Octave and Matlab, Alex Verstak, 2001/08/30