[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(OFF TOPIC?) libatlas.so vs. libatlas.a
From: |
Stef Pillaert |
Subject: |
(OFF TOPIC?) libatlas.so vs. libatlas.a |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 18:45:16 +0200 |
This isn't (entirely) octave related, but I perhaps someone can help. I found
a couple related mails on the octave-lists, but didn't find a complete
answer...
*Has someone a recipe on howto build dynamic libraries for atlas?
(libatlas.so). And also for a dynamic lib liblapack.so with the changes that
atlas provides?
*Has someone a recipe on how to compile octave with these dynamic libraries?
With static libs all goes fine...
(I use RedHat 7.1)
Stef.
--
==============================================================
Stef Pillaert
Brusselse steenweg
B9090 Melle (Belgium-Europe)
Phone: (00) 32 / (0) 9 / 252 20 51
E-mail: address@hidden
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- (OFF TOPIC?) libatlas.so vs. libatlas.a,
Stef Pillaert <=