[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: suppress condition warning on inv?

From: Rolf Fabian
Subject: Re: suppress condition warning on inv?
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:28:35 +0100

Paul Kienzle wrote

|Calling cond/svd takes 2x longer than the inverse itself, and if it
|passes, I will still want to do the inverse, so that's not an ideal solution.
|Shall I patch so that it accepts the form: [X, rcond] = inv(A); ?

I encountered similar problems and do strongly support that the proposed patch
will be implemented into Octave.

Furthermore, I'd like to see an analogous appoach for ,det'. 


Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:
How to fund new projects:
Subscription information:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]