[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mean.m (a question of mathematics, not programming)
From: |
John Day |
Subject: |
Re: mean.m (a question of mathematics, not programming) |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:04:32 -0500 |
Joshua,
The arithmetic and geometric means both attempt to give an answer to the
question "what is the _average_ value of a set of numbers?" An interesting
property of both is that they return the same answer if the number are all
the same: i.e. the average value of {5,5,5} (a.m. or g.m.) is 5. But the
geometric mean is more 'sensitive' to values at or near zero, because the
terms are multiplied rather than added. If the set contains a single zero,
the g.m. will always be zero, it can never 'recover' by adding larger terms
to offset the smaller terms, like you can do with the a.m.
In fact, the g.m. is often employed when you want your estimate of the
expected value to be very sensitive to the presence of values near or at zero.
References? Any mathematical dictionary will do. I really like the
Harper-Collins Dictionary of Mathematics. It's almost like a Master's
Degree in a book.
HTH,
John Day
Staff Scientist
Computer Science Innovations
http://www.csi.cc/~jday
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------