[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: memory exhausted
From: |
A. Scottedward Hodel |
Subject: |
Re: memory exhausted |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jul 1998 14:53:52 -0500 |
Thanks, but it's not equivalent if you have widely varying coefficients...
Which I do. (from 1e-5 to 1e+7, balancing inappropriate in this appl. for
non-numerical reasons.).
A S Hodel Dept Elect Eng, Auburn Univ,AL 36849-5201
On leave at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (205) 544-1426
----------
>From: Guido Dietz <address@hidden>
>To: "A. Scottedward Hodel" <address@hidden>
>Cc: address@hidden
>Subject: RE: memory exhausted
>Date: Tue, Jul 28, 1998, 2:43 PM
>
>On 28-Jul-98 A. Scottedward Hodel wrote:
>> I ran the following code on 1 172x172 matrix:
>>
>># truncate acd to 6 digits of precision...
>> for ii=1:rows(acd)
>> for jj = 1:columns(acd)
>> eval(["acd(ii,jj) = ",sprintf("%12.6E",acd(ii,jj));]);
>> endfor
>> endfor
>What about:
>acd=round(acd*1e6)/1e6;
>Should a) work and b) be faster ...
>
>G.
>
- memory exhausted, A. Scottedward Hodel, 1998/07/28
- Re: memory exhausted,
A. Scottedward Hodel <=