[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does your machine also FFT like mine?
From: |
PETER HOPFGARTNER |
Subject: |
Re: Does your machine also FFT like mine? |
Date: |
Mon, 11 May 98 17:30:43 +0100 |
On Digital Unix 4.0c, Alpha 20164a, egcs-1.0.2 for C, C++, Digital
Fortran, Octave 2.0.12:
1.0000e+00 1.0000e+00 7.3275e-16 7.3275e-16 1.0000e+00
Peter
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Does your machine also FFT like mine?
Author: <address@hidden > at NOVARALINK
Date: 5/11/98 10:16 AM
Encouraged by the prompt responses to my plot question -- thanks
everyone! -- let me rephrase the FFT one to which nobody replied.
On my Linux/586 machine, I get
> ifft(fft([1 1 0 0 1]))
ans =
1.0000e+00 1.0000e+00 -1.4682e-08 -1.4682e-08 1.0000e+00
This is only single precision accurate. Unfortunately the other
machines I have access to have the same architecture and use the
same binary and not surprisingly gives the same result.
What happens on your machine?
Dirk
- Re: Does your machine also FFT like mine?, (continued)
- Re: Does your machine also FFT like mine?, Francesco Potorti`, 1998/05/11
- RE: Does your machine also FFT like mine?, Ted Harding, 1998/05/11
- Does your machine also FFT like mine?, John W. Eaton, 1998/05/11
- Re: Does your machine also FFT like mine?, Jim Van Zandt, 1998/05/12
- Re: Does your machine also FFT like mine?, Kai Mueller, 1998/05/13
- Re: Does your machine also FFT like mine?, Bryce Gardner, 1998/05/11
- Re: Does your machine also FFT like mine?,
PETER HOPFGARTNER <=