[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Performance: Octave vs. Matlab
From: |
wkim+ |
Subject: |
Performance: Octave vs. Matlab |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Apr 95 14:05:20 -0400 |
Hi, I'm new to this list.
A few days ago, I got an OS/2 version of octave 1.1 and it was quite
good. However, after giving a few tests, I found it very slower than
Matlab for Windows. About 3 times slower on a P90. I failed to find
a doc that mentioned about performance issue to see if I could boost
Octave's performance.
A free software can be slower or faster than a commercial product,
but 3X slower speed was too big for me to understand.
(I suspect that the OS/2 port might not be optimized when compiling.)
With such slow speed, I doubt I would use octave in a real application.
Maybe I missed something as I don't yet know octave enough.
I want your comments. Thanks.
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
// Wonkoo Kim
// address@hidden
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Performance: Octave vs. Matlab,
wkim+ <=