|
From: | Beatrix Boone |
Subject: | out |
Date: | Sun, 1 Oct 2006 12:14:24 +0900 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) |
An with a concert running inside, many folks are out at the bar getting their fill of alcohol. Leaving us craving for more. It's the first prototype and I can say that it's ready for use. On the one hand, he makes interesting and insightful observations on all sorts of phenomena; on the other, he never really synthesizes those observations into a single, coherent argument. What you see is what you get there. Never was someone who enjoyed flowers but seeing them in their own natural habitat brings joy and peace to the mind. Never was someone who enjoyed flowers but seeing them in their own natural habitat brings joy and peace to the mind. Every hypothesis, in essence, is a prediction about the future. Not too sure about the amount of truth in that, we can only wait and see. A bold move that many only dare to dream of but not able to commit. I think that that is neither true nor a good value. He had been living in a risk filled lifestyle and it appears that one of those risk materialized. Which brings me to the second appeal Wittgenstein has for me: he has at least some understanding and awareness of mathematics. The dilemma is that when individuals pursue personal gain, the net result for society as a whole may be impoverishment. Overlay them onto the Google Map and the effect is impressive. On a side track, just realized that we both have a mole on the top right of our lips, probably the reason why I'm also exploring this land but under a much more risk controlled environment. The primitive language-game which children are taught needs no justification; attempts at justification need to be rejected. No matter what, it is something I'll bring friends and have another go at it. However, he also thinks that theories are conventions and definitions of concepts, not true descriptions of physical phenomena based necessarily on experimental results. I do hope he is TOTALLY wrong! It would seem to me that the branches of physics which are entirely theoretical are for practical purposes basically metaphysics. Zoology and the like I think are, because hypothetical prediction inherently implies classification. The famous Melbourne Flower clock and the famous Sofia Restaurant which serves huge portion of whatever you order. Without the steady march of time, this unity of behavior disappears, and there are simply a million disparate entities. Which brings me to the second appeal Wittgenstein has for me: he has at least some understanding and awareness of mathematics. When the facts or events are given, anyone can interpret them, and the fact that these events are known can mask the relative merits of the theory which interprets them. It's the first prototype and I can say that it's ready for use. It's the first prototype and I can say that it's ready for use. Zoology and the like I think are, because hypothetical prediction inherently implies classification. Added some coordinates on them and viola! a great sunday spent in spring. |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |