[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Finding second route through rules
|
From: |
Steven Simpson |
|
Subject: |
Re: Finding second route through rules |
|
Date: |
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:56:19 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 |
Hi Luke,
On 01/02/16 21:29, Luke Shumaker wrote:
> Having to keep track of the bar's, baz's, qu+x's didn't help either :)
Sorry; I realised after posting that it might be a burden.
> Here is an "improved" makefile that I think demonstrates the situation
> more clearly.
[Snip an improved makefile]
> Besides changing names, I also moved the "correct" branch up, to
> remove the possibility that it was choosing the "mislead" branch
> simply because it was listed first, which is what make does if
> everything else ties.
I understood that it shouldn't matter anyway, because they're not
branches from the same point, i.e., they don't have the same target.
Cheers!