[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Missing Something Obvious
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Missing Something Obvious |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:17:06 -0500 |
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 09:53 -0500, Marc Smith wrote:
> I must be missing something obvious... I'm using the shell function in
> my Makefile with a recursive variable, however, it seems the command
> in my shell function is only being evaluated once. I've tried this on
> two different Linux distributions and get the same result; from
> everything I read (even in the O'Reilly GNU Make book), this should
> not be working this way. See below for an example:
>
> --snip--
> address@hidden testing]$ cat Makefile
> blah = $(shell date)
>
> all:
> @ echo $(blah)
> @ sleep 10
> @ echo $(blah)
> --snip--
The behavior you're seeing is expected.
GNU make IS evaluating that function twice. However, make expands all
the lines in a recipe before it invokes the first one. It does not
expand them one at a time, just before it invokes them.
So even though make is running the "date" command twice, it's doing this
one right after the other so they have the same result.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.net
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
- Missing Something Obvious, Marc Smith, 2011/11/14
- Re: Missing Something Obvious,
Paul Smith <=
- Re: Missing Something Obvious, Marc Smith, 2011/11/14
- Re: Missing Something Obvious, Paul Smith, 2011/11/14
- Re: Missing Something Obvious, Marc Smith, 2011/11/14
- Re: Missing Something Obvious, Marc Smith, 2011/11/14
- Re: Missing Something Obvious, Philip Guenther, 2011/11/14
- Re: Missing Something Obvious, Marc Smith, 2011/11/14
- Re: Missing Something Obvious, Paul Smith, 2011/11/14
- Re: Missing Something Obvious, David Boyce, 2011/11/14
- Re: Missing Something Obvious, Marc Smith, 2011/11/14
- Re: Missing Something Obvious, Paul Smith, 2011/11/14