Re: Expanding variables as part of function arguments

[Philip Guenther]

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Anthony Penniston
<address@hidden> wrote:
...
> But going back to my original message, none of these solutions feel 'natural' 
> to what ought to be a common task for make.

I think this is the first time I've seen someone do something quite
like this.  It seems a bit 'unnatural' to me for various reasons,
including that I find determining what is involved in a project by
scanning directories to be fragile, and that combining different types
of object files (.o vs .class) in a single variable seems useless to
me, but you probably would find my own Makefile habits to be
'unnatural'.


Philip Guenther