[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: forcing a rule
From: |
Boris Kolpackov |
Subject: |
Re: forcing a rule |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:26:32 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
Hi Noel,
> Boris Kolpackov wrote:
> > I agree with all that you've said. But I still think it's a bad
> > practice to silently ignore patches and effort people put in
> > creating them. I for example went an extra mile and added
> > documentation for $(lastword) so that it would be complete.
>
> I can't speak for the GNU make project (and I don't have time to read
> up on the topic), but another open source project I've worked on
> _requires_ documentation of a patch just to be considered for inclusion.
If you read what I said more carefully you will see that I was
talking about documentation for $(lastword), not for the patch
itself (which was submitted too, btw).
-boris
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), (continued)
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Noel Yap, 2004/04/02
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/04
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Noel Yap, 2004/04/14
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/14
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Noel Yap, 2004/04/14
- Re: forcing a rule, Paul D. Smith, 2004/04/04
- Re: forcing a rule, Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/04
- Re: forcing a rule, Paul D. Smith, 2004/04/04
- Re: forcing a rule, Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/04
- Re: forcing a rule, Noel Yap, 2004/04/14
- Re: forcing a rule,
Boris Kolpackov <=